If you are writing an annotated bibliography with many sources, it may be helpful to divide the sources into categories. Note also that the entries are alphabetized by the first word in the bibliographic entry. The bibliographic information above is proper MLA format (use whatever style is appropriate in your field) and the annotations are in paragraph form. But again, if your assignment is to only use scholarly sources, then you will probably want to avoid magazines and popular web sites. You may want to investigate how scholarly sources are treating this topic differently than more popular sources. Using a variety of sources can help give you a broader picture of what is being said about your topic. "Bush Stands Pat on Stem Cell Policy." CNN. How does it fit into your research? Is this a helpful resource? Too scholarly? Not scholarly enough? Too general/specific? Since "stem cell research" is a very broad topic, has this source helped you to narrow your topic? After summarizing and assessing, you can now reflect on this source. The length of your annotation will depend on the assignment or on the purpose of your annotated bibliography. Does it seem like a reliable and current source? Why? Is the research biased or objective? Are the facts well documented? Who is the author? Is she qualified in this subject? Is this source scholarly, popular, some of both? If one were really writing an annotation for this source, one would offer a brief summary of what this book says about stem cell research.Īfter a brief summary, it would be appropriate to assess this source and offer some criticisms of it. This is the annotation of the above source, which is formatted according to MLA 2016 (8 th ed.) guidelines for the bibliographic information listed above. ![]() The Human Embryonic Stem Cell Debate: Science, Ethics, and Public Policy. Writing Letters of Recommendation for Students.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |